3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 51 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Shrestha v. Holder.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Shrestha v. Holder Anchor | green | “an adverse credibility determination is not necessarily a death knell to cat protection.” | 24 |
| 2 | Morshed Alam v. Merrick Garland | green | “totality of the circumstances and all relevant factors.” | 20 |
| 3 | Rizk v. Holder | green | “conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.