3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 40 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill Anchor | red | “hen the federal-law claims have dropped out of the lawsuit in its early stages and only state-law claims remain, the federal court should decline the exercise of jurisdiction by dismissing the case without prejudice.” | 21 |
| 2 | Catzin v. Thank You & Good Luck Corp. | green | “under this prong, in a great many cases, the evaluation will usually result in the dismissal of the state-law claims.” | 10 |
| 3 | Kolari v. New York-Presbyterian Hospital | green | “n the usual case in which all federal-law claims are eliminated before trial, the balance of factors . . . will point toward declining to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state-law claims.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.