4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Medicare Reimbursement Litigation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Medicare Reimbursement Litigation Anchor | green | “(1) the plaintiff has a clear right to relief; (2) the defendant has a clear duty to act; and (3) there is no other adequate remedy available to the plaintiff.” | 31 |
| 2 | Northern States Power Co. v. United States Department of Energy | green | “has the burden of showing that 'its right to issuance of the writ is clear and indisputable.” | 10 |
| 3 | Women Prisoners of the District of Columbia Department of Corrections v. District of Columbia | green | “the dissimilar treatment of dissimilarly situated persons does not violate equal protection.” | 6 |
| 4 | Luis Sepulveda v. Alberto Gonzales, Attorney General of the United States, 1 | green | “does not strip courts of jurisdiction to review nondiscretionary decisions regarding an alien's eligibility for” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.