2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Luce v. United States.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Luce v. United States Anchor | green | “to raise and preserve for review the claim of improper impeachment with a prior conviction, a defendant must testify.” | 46 |
| 2 | Grace v. Artuz | green | “petitioner's claim as to the impropriety of the sandoval ruling does not raise a constitutional issue cognizable on habeas review” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.