Topic: no antiremoval presumption attends cases invoking cafa, whi… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #7045

5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. Owens Anchor
scotus · 2014
green “no antiremoval presumption attends cases invoking cafa, which congress enacted to facilitate adjudication of certain class actions in federal court.” 22
2 Korn v. Polo Ralph Lauren Corp.
caed · 2008
green “a defendant's preponderance burden 'is not daunting, as courts recognize that under this standard, a removing defendant is not obligated to research, state, and prove the plaintiff's claims for damages.” 11
3 Coleman v. Estes Express Lines, Inc.
· 2010
green “research, state, and prove the plaintiff's claims for damages.” 7
4 Delores Lewis v. Verizon Communications, Inc.
ca9 · 2010
green “a removing defendant is not required to go so far as to prove plaintiff's case for him by proving the actual rates of violation.” 6
5 Kenneth Rothschild Trust v. Morgan Stanley Dean Witter
cacd · 2002
green “show, as a matter of law, that it is certain he will not recover the jurisdictional amount.” 4

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check