8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 323 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Beyer v. County of Nassau.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Beyer v. County of Nassau Anchor | green | “a dispute about a 'genuine issue' exists for summary judgment purposes where the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could decide in the non-movant's favor.” | 97 |
| 2 | Mark Giannullo v. City of New York | green | “if the opposing party . . . fails to controvert a fact so set forth in the moving party's rule 56.1 statement, that fact will be deemed admitted.” | 81 |
| 3 | Spinelli v. City of New York | green | “resolves all ambiguities, and credits all factual inferences that could rationally be drawn, in favor of the party opposing summary judgment.” | 56 |
| 4 | Jasco Tools, Inc. v. Dana Corp. | green | “is not to resolve disputed questions of fact but only to determine whether, as to any material issue, a genuine factual dispute exists.” | 25 |
| 5 | Loeffler v. Staten Island University Hospital | green | “the moving party bears the burden of showing that he or she is entitled to summary judgment.” | 24 |
| 6 | Jasco Tools, Inc. v. Dana Corp. | green | “may properly be granted ... only where there is no genuine issue of material fact to be tried, and the facts as to which there is no such issue warrant judgment for the moving party as a matter of law.” | 23 |
| 7 | Beyer v. County of Nassau | green | “exists for summary judgment purposes where the evidence is such that a reasonable jury could decide in the non-movant's favor.” | 12 |
| 8 | Marczeski v. GAVITT | green | “a motion for summary judgment is properly supported by documentary and testimonial evidence ... the nonmoving party may not rest upon the mere allegations or denials of his pleadings, but rather must present significant probative evidence to establish a genuine issue of fact.” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.