3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from As GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF v. GRACE OLIVA.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | As GUARDIAN AD LITEM OF v. GRACE OLIVA Anchor | green | “contemporaneous knowledge of the offending incident or knowledge of a prior pattern of similar incidents.” | 26 |
| 2 | Maldonado v. Terhune | green | “the severity of the medical problems, the potential for harm if the medical care is denied or delayed and whether any such harm actually resulted from the lack of medical attention.” | 15 |
| 3 | Atkinson v. Taylor | green | “one that is so obvious that a lay person would recognize the necessity for a doctor's attention” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.