2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ylst v. Nunnemaker.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ylst v. Nunnemaker Anchor | green | “where there has been one reasoned state judgment rejecting a federal claim, later unexplained orders upholding that judgment or rejecting the same claim rest upon the same ground.” | 32 |
| 2 | Roa v. Portuondo | green | “any attempt to raise these claims at this stage as part of a direct appeal would be rejected because a criminal defendant is entitled to only one direct appeal and one application for leave to appeal to the court of appeals.” | 7 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.