8 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Phillips.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Phillips Anchor | green | “the foremost and dominant consideration.” | 11 |
| 2 | Greater Houston Transportation Co. v. Phillips | green | “foreseeability of the risk is the foremost and dominant consideration.” | 10 |
| 3 | Graff v. Beard | green | “it is fundamental that the existence of a legally cognizable duty is a prerequisite to all tort liability.” | 6 |
| 4 | Dukes v. PHILIP JOHNSON/ALAN RITCHIE ARCH., PC | green | “depends on the particular agreement entered into with his employer.” | 5 |
| 5 | Hunt v. Ellisor & Tanner, Inc. | green | “visit, to familiarize, to determine, to inform, and to endeavor to guard” | 5 |
| 6 | Hunt v. Ellisor & Tanner, Inc. | green | “visit, to familiarize, to determine, to inform, and to endeavor to guard.” | 5 |
| 7 | Texas Home Management, Inc. v. Peavy | green | “factors such as the risk and foreseeability of injury, the social utility of the actor's conduct, the consequences of imposing the burden on the actor, and any other relevant competing individual and social interests implicated by the facts of the case.” | 4 |
| 8 | Hunt v. Ellisor & Tanner, Inc. | green | “the architect shall be responsible for the architect's negligent acts or omissions, but shall not . . . be responsible for acts or omissions of the contractor . . . .” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.