4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Tercero v. ROMAN CATH. DIOCESE OF NORWICH.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tercero v. ROMAN CATH. DIOCESE OF NORWICH Anchor | green | “extends the jurisdictional reach of new mexico courts as far as constitutionally permissible.” | 27 |
| 2 | AST Sports Science, Inc. v. CLF Distribution Ltd. | green | “the plaintiff may make this prima facie showing by demonstrating, via affidavit or other written materials, facts that if true would support jurisdiction over the defendant.” | 9 |
| 3 | Old Republic Insurance Co. v. Continental Motors, Inc. | green | “due process requires both that the defendant 'purposefully established minimum contacts within the forum state' and that the assertion of personal jurisdiction would comport with 'fair play and substantial justice.” | 8 |
| 4 | Tercero v. ROMAN CATH. DIOCESE OF NORWICH | green | “statute extends the jurisdictional reach of new mexico courts as far as constitutionally permissible.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.