3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In Re Shredder Co., LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In Re Shredder Co., LLC Anchor | green | “relator has made repeated requests for a ruling on its motion.” | 18 |
| 2 | In Re Hearn | green | “relator has made repeated requests for a ruling on its motion.” | 16 |
| 3 | In Re Piper | green | “a court with mandamus authority 'will grant mandamus relief if relator can demonstrate that the act sought to be compelled is purely 'ministerial' and that relator has no other adequate legal remedy.” | 16 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.