3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 39 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States of America and Earl E. Hart, Revenue Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. Stanley P. Gimbel.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States of America and Earl E. Hart, Revenue Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. Stanley P. Gimbel Anchor | green | “it is well-settled that an issue not presented in the district court cannot be raised for the first time on appeal” | 13 |
| 2 | Byron K. Morse v. Craig Hanks | green | “a prima facie case of purposeful discrimination can be established where the prosecution uses a peremptory challenge to strike the only black venireman in the panel.” | 13 |
| 3 | United States v. Vernard L. Green, Jr. | green | “rule 801(d)(1)(b) does not bar the introduction of a prior consistent statement through the testimony of someone other than the declarant, so long as the declarant is available for cross-examination about the statement at some time during trial.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.