5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Edward Thomas Kendrick, III v. State of Tennessee.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Edward Thomas Kendrick, III v. State of Tennessee Anchor | green | “the standard of review for rulings on hearsay evidence has multiple layers.” | 19 |
| 2 | Keisling v. Keisling | green | “it necessarily is a question of law” | 13 |
| 3 | State of Tennessee v. Jessie Dotson | green | “expressly adopted and applied the same analysis used to evaluate claims based on the confrontation clause of the sixth amendment.” | 9 |
| 4 | State of Tennessee v. Jessie Dotson | green | “statements . . . by their nature were not testimonial,” | 5 |
| 5 | State v. Deuter | green | “a higher right than that found in the federal constitution.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.