3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 50 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Perkins, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2005).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Perkins, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2005) Anchor | neutral | “trial court's decision was unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable.” | 27 |
| 2 | State v. Morris | green | “a review under the abuse-of-discretion standard is a deferential review.” | 20 |
| 3 | State v. Perkins, Unpublished Decision (12-12-2005) | neutral | “unreasonable, arbitrary or unconscionable.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.