4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 49 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Brewer v. Williams.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Brewer v. Williams Anchor | green | “an intentional relinquishment or abandonment of a known right or privilege.” | 26 |
| 2 | Panetti v. Quarterman | green | “aedpa does not 'require state and federal courts to wait for some nearly identical factual pattern before a legal rule must be applied.” | 15 |
| 3 | Willie Henderson v. Krista Wilcoxen | green | “don't mean it was modeled on the proce- dures employed by the inquisition.” | 4 |
| 4 | Willie Henderson v. Krista Wilcoxen | green | “in modern usage an inquisitorial hearing is a hearing in open court in which the judge examines the parties to the suit rather than leaving examination to the lawyers, as in our legal system, which is adver- sarial rather than inquisitorial.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.