8 canonical passages across 7 cases, quoted by 49 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Josephine Tijerino v. Stetson Desert Project, LLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Josephine Tijerino v. Stetson Desert Project, LLC Anchor | green | “in general, dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction should be without prejudice.” | 15 |
| 2 | Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest Service | green | “some discretion to influence or change the activity for the benefit of a protected species.” | 6 |
| 3 | Leisnoi, Inc. v. United States | green | “set forth with particularity the nature of the right, title, or interest which the plaintiff claims in the real property, the circumstances under which it was acquired, and the right, title, or interest claimed by the united states.” | 5 |
| 4 | Carey Mills v. United States | green | “in construing the scope of the qta's waiver of sovereign immunity, courts have read narrowly the requirement that the title at issue be 'disputed.” | 5 |
| 5 | Carey Mills v. United States | green | “to satisfy the 'disputed title' element of the qta, a plaintiff must show that the united states has either expressly disputed title or taken action that implicitly disputes it.” | 5 |
| 6 | North Dakota ex rel. Stenehjem v. United States | green | “more than notice of a mere possibility, in the future, that a right-of-way may be limited or access denied.” | 5 |
| 7 | Ken McMaster v. United States | green | “two conditions must exist before a district court can exercise jurisdiction over an action under the qta: 1) the united states must claim an interest in the property at issue, and 2) there must be a disputed title to real property between the interests of the plaintiff and the u…” | 4 |
| 8 | Kane County, Utah v. United States | green | “actions of the united states that merely produce some ambiguity regarding a plaintiff's title are insufficient to constitute 'disputed title.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.