3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 38 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from ESAB Group, Incorporated v. Zurich Insurance PLC.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | ESAB Group, Incorporated v. Zurich Insurance PLC Anchor | green | “section 1367(c) recognizes courts' authority to decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction in limited circumstances, including . . . where the court dismisses the claims over which it has original jurisdiction.” | 17 |
| 2 | Robertson v. Cease | green | “citizenship and residence, as often declared by this court, are not synonymous terms.” | 11 |
| 3 | International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace Workers v. Werner-Masuda | green | “because the court will dismiss the claims over which it has original jurisdiction, the court will decline to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over the remaining state law claims.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.