Topic: explain what was wrong with the reasoning that the district… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #7267

4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 49 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Nixon v. City & County of Denver.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Nixon v. City & County of Denver Anchor
ca10 · 2015
green “explain what was wrong with the reasoning that the district court relied on in reaching its decision” 16
2 Utah Environmental Congress v. Dale Bosworth
ca10 · 2006
green “an issue mentioned in a brief on appeal, but not addressed, is waived.” 12
3 Buchheit v. Green
ca10 · 2012
green “existence of a reasoned, nonfrivolous argument on the law and facts in support of the issues raised,” 6

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check