9 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 49 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pirtle v. Gregory.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pirtle v. Gregory Anchor | green | “in those rare instances in which the record shows the court lacked jurisdiction or that the public interest is directly and adversely affected as that interest is declared in the statutes or the constitution of texas.” | 12 |
| 2 | Pirtle v. Gregory | green | “fundamental error survives today in those rare instances in which the record shows the court lacked jurisdiction or that the public interest is directly and adversely affected as that interest is declared in the statutes or the constitution of texas.” | 7 |
| 3 | Pirtle v. Gregory | green | “the record shows the court lacked jurisdiction or that the public interest is directly and adversely affected as that interest is declared in the statutes or the constitution of texas.” | 7 |
| 4 | Wyatt v. Shaw Plumbing Co. | green | “an inherent interrelation of the subject matter” | 6 |
| 5 | Gonzalez v. Reliant Energy, Inc. | green | “the plaintiff's privilege to choose the forum” | 5 |
| 6 | Henke v. Peoples State Bank of Hallettsville | green | “are conditions that altered the status quo existing after the temporary injunction was granted or that made the temporary injunction unnecessary or improper.” | 3 |
| 7 | Henke v. Peoples State Bank of Hallettsville | green | “changed circumstances are conditions that altered the status quo existing after the temporary injunction was granted or that made the temporary injunction unnecessary or improper.” | 3 |
| 8 | Ray v. Paulus | green | “the injunction granted by the court below was ancillary in nature,” | 3 |
| 9 | Herider Farm Processing, Inc. v. City of Nacogdoches | green | “until such time as the principal suit herein may be tried to a conclusion.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.