4 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 49 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Karenev v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Karenev v. State Anchor | green | “a defendant may not raise for the first time on appeal a facial challenge to the constitutionality of a statute.” | 37 |
| 2 | Lumsden v. State | green | “if the defendant answers that he is not guilty, such plea shall be entered upon the minutes of the court; if he refuses to answer, the plea of not guilty shall in like manner be entered.” | 4 |
| 3 | Coyle v. State | green | “she was innocent of violating the contract with the state of texas, because no contract exists” | 4 |
| 4 | Saldana v. State | green | “functionally indistinguishable.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.