Topic: coextensive with the due process requirements of the united… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #7433

9 canonical passages across 9 cases, quoted by 48 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Loretta Klump v. J. David Duffus, Jr., Law Offices of Dixon, Duffus & Doub, a Partnership, and Accident and Injury Referral Service.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Loretta Klump v. J. David Duffus, Jr., Law Offices of Dixon, Duffus & Doub, a Partnership, and Accident and Injury Referral Service Anchor
ca7 · 1996
green “coextensive with the due process requirements of the united states constitution” 10
2 Rosier v. Cascade Mountain, Inc.
illappct · 2006
green “exercise jurisdiction on any other basis now or hereafter permitted by the illinois constitution and the constitution of the united states.” 8
3 Knaus v. Guidry
illappct · 2009
green “if jurisdictional facts remain in controversy, then the court must conduct a hearing to resolve those disputes.” 6
4 ABN AMRO, Inc. v. Capital International Ltd.
ilnd · 2008
green “the seventh circuit has repeatedly held that tortfeasors must expect to be haled into illinois courts for torts where the injury took place there.” 5
5 Arthur Young & Co. v. Bremer
illappct · 1990
green “for purposes of the tort provision of the long-arm statute, the place of the wrong is the place where the last event necessary to hold the actor liable takes place.” 5
6 Bell v. Don Prudhomme Racing, Inc.
illappct · 2010
green “while defendant has contested some of the facts asserted by plaintiff, the facts relied on by this court in finding specific personal jurisdiction are not contested by defendant.” 4
7 MacNeil v. Trambert
illappct · 2010
green “resolve in favor of the plaintiff any conflicts in the pleadings and affidavits.” 4
8 Alderson v. Southern Co.
illappct · 2001
green “the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing a prima facie basis upon which jurisdiction over an out-of-state resident may be exercised.” 3
9 Robillard v. Berends
illappct · 2007
green “the applicable factors weigh in favor of the plaintiff's position” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check