6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 309 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from People v. Hardiman.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | People v. Hardiman Anchor | green | “it is for the trier of fact, not the appellate court, to determine what inferences may be fairly drawn from the evidence and to determine the weight to be accorded those inferences.” | 142 |
| 2 | People v. Blevins | green | “circumstantial evidence and the reasonable inferences that arise from that evidence can constitute satisfactory proof of the elements of the crime.” | 44 |
| 3 | People v. Bailey | green | “the standard of review is deferential: a reviewing court is required to draw all reasonable inferences and make credibility choices in support of the jury verdict.” | 36 |
| 4 | People v. Tennyson | green | “whether a rational trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 30 |
| 5 | People v. Tennyson | green | “a rational trier of fact could find the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 29 |
| 6 | People v. Henry | green | “we review de novo a challenge on appeal to the sufficiency of the evidence.” | 28 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.