5 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 48 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litigation.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | In re Cardizem CD Antitrust Litigation Anchor | green | “there is a strong public interest in encouraging settlement of complex litigation and class action suits because they are 'notoriously difficult and unpredictable' and settlement conserves judicial resources.” | 20 |
| 2 | Powers v. Hamilton County Public Defender Commission | green | “cases alleging a single course of wrongful conduct are particularly well-suited to class certification.” | 13 |
| 3 | Calloway v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. | green | “is met if the class action is a better way than individual litigation to adjudicate a claim.” | 8 |
| 4 | Calloway v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. | green | “the superiority requirement . . . is met if the class action is a better way than individual litigation to adjudicate a claim.” | 4 |
| 5 | Calloway v. Caraco Pharmaceutical Laboratories, Ltd. | green | “is a better way than individual litigation to adjudicate a claim.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.