8 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 304 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jeffrey S. v. State Board Of Education Of Georgia.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jeffrey S. v. State Board Of Education Of Georgia Anchor | green | “give fresh consideration to those issues to which specific objection has been made by a party.” | 60 |
| 2 | United States v. Farias-Gonzalez | green | “shall make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” | 42 |
| 3 | Bill W. Doe v. Anthony M. Frank, Postmaster General of the United States of America | green | “a substantial privacy right which outweighs the 'customary and constitutionally-embedded presumption of openness in judicial proceedings.” | 38 |
| 4 | Antonio Carrizosa v. Chiquita Brands International | green | “(1) is challenging government activity; (2) would be compelled, absent anonymity, to disclose information of the utmost intimacy; or (3) would be compelled, absent anonymity, to admit an intent to engage in illegal conduct and thus risk criminal prosecution.” | 36 |
| 5 | B v. Francis | green | “strong presumption in favor of parties proceeding in their own names . . . the rule is not absolute.” | 35 |
| 6 | B v. Francis | green | “whether the plaintiffs were minors, whether they were threatened with violence or physical harm by proceeding in their own names, and whether their anonymity posed a unique threat of fundamental unfairness to the defendant.” | 35 |
| 7 | Antonio Carrizosa v. Chiquita Brands International | green | “the severity and the likelihood of the perceived harm; the precision with which the order is drawn; the availability of a less onerous alternative; and the duration of the order,” | 29 |
| 8 | Antonio Carrizosa v. Chiquita Brands International | green | “totality-of-the- circumstances question.” | 29 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.