6 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 48 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dickie.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dickie Anchor | green | “quantum of evidence sufficient to persuade a rational fair-minded person the premise is true.” | 10 |
| 2 | Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dickie | green | “sufficient to persuade a rational fair-minded person the premise is true.” | 10 |
| 3 | Merriman v. Cokeley | green | “disturb findings of fact supported by substantial evidence even if there is conflicting evidence.” | 10 |
| 4 | Sunnyside Valley Irrigation District v. Dickie | green | “a quantum of evidence sufficient to persuade a rational fair-minded person the premise is true.” | 8 |
| 5 | Quinn v. Cherry Lane Auto Plaza, Inc. | green | “appellate courts do not hear or weigh evidence, find facts, or substitute their opinions for those of the trier-of-fact.” | 6 |
| 6 | Merriman v. Cokeley | green | “a reviewing court may not disturb findings of fact supported by substantial evidence even if there is conflicting evidence.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.