3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Robert Baum v. Helget Gas Products, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Robert Baum v. Helget Gas Products, Inc. Anchor | green | “summary judgment is not appropriate if the non-moving party can set forth specific facts, by affidavit, deposition, or other evidence, showing a genuine issue for trial.” | 24 |
| 2 | Michael Woods v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation | green | “there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” | 13 |
| 3 | Anda v. Wickes Furniture Co., Inc. | green | “must substantiate its allegations with sufficient probative evidence that would permit a finding in its favor.” | 10 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.