5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Ira A. Watson Department Store v. Hamilton.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ira A. Watson Department Store v. Hamilton Anchor | green | “so unreasonable under the evidence that it must be viewed as erroneous as a matter of law.” | 19 |
| 2 | Ira A. Watson Department Store v. Hamilton | green | “is so unreasonable under the evidence that it must be viewed as erroneous as a matter of law.” | 16 |
| 3 | Whittaker v. Rowland | green | “substantial evidence has been defined as some evidence of substance and relevant consequence, having the fitness to induce conviction in the minds of reasonable men.” | 5 |
| 4 | Groce v. Vanmeter Contracting, Inc. | green | “in order to rise to the level of compelling evidence, and thereby justify reversal of the alj under this circumstance, the evidence must be so overwhelming that no reasonable person could reach the same conclusion as did the alj.” | 4 |
| 5 | Brown-Forman Corp. v. Upchurch | green | “medical causation must be proved to a reasonable medical probability with expert medical testimony but does not require it to be proved with objective medical findings.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.