3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 47 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Encarnacion Ex Rel. George v. Astrue.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Encarnacion Ex Rel. George v. Astrue Anchor | green | “first, the child must not be engaged in 'substantial gainful activity.' second, the child 'must have a medically determinable impairment(s)' that is 'severe' in that it causes 'more than minimal functional limitations.' third, the child's impairment or combination of impairments…” | 19 |
| 2 | Encarnacion Ex Rel. George v. Astrue | green | “for a child's impairment to functionally equal a listed impairment, the impairment must 'result in "marked” | 19 |
| 3 | Urena v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec. | green | “importantly, it is not a reviewing court's function to determine de novo whether a claimant is disabled.” | 9 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.