4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 299 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Pulliam Investment Co., Inc. v. Cameo Properties.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Pulliam Investment Co., Inc. v. Cameo Properties Anchor | green | “only when it is clear that there is no dispute concerning either the facts of the controversy or the inferences to be drawn from those facts.” | 140 |
| 2 | David E. Camby v. Larry Davis James M. Lester | green | “in the absence of objection . . . we do not believe that it requires any explanation.” | 135 |
| 3 | Pulliam Investment Co., Inc. v. Cameo Properties | green | “summary judgment is proper only when it is clear that there is no dispute concerning either the facts of the controversy or the inferences to be drawn from those facts.” | 19 |
| 4 | Davis v. Williams | green | “there was a long history of delay” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.