4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 46 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Thomas Malone, Jr..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Thomas Malone, Jr. Anchor | green | “is not a sufficient ground for reversal.” | 26 |
| 2 | United States v. Lopez-Velasquez | green | “the sentencing court is free to conclude that the applicable guidelines range gives too much or too little weight to one or more factors, and may adjust the sentence accordingly under 3553(a).” | 9 |
| 3 | United States v. Jose Gerezano-Rosales | green | “the totality of the circumstances, including the extent of any variance from the guidelines range, to determine whether, as a matter of substance, the sentencing factors in section 3553(a) support the sentence.” | 6 |
| 4 | United States v. Thomas Malone, Jr. | green | “is not a sufficient ground for reversal” | 5 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.