5 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 46 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Mildred Thomas v. Carolyn Colvin.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mildred Thomas v. Carolyn Colvin Anchor | green | “accurate and logical bridge from the evidence to conclusion,” | 31 |
| 2 | Minger v. Berryhill | green | “can reasonably be accepted as consistent with the objective medical evidence and other evidence.” | 5 |
| 3 | William N. RAY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee | green | “rare case in which the claimant can overcome the 'considerable deference' the court affords such findings unless they are 'patently wrong” | 4 |
| 4 | Underwood v. Astrue | green | “the alj is the factfinder in a disability proceeding-it is for him to weigh evidence and determine credibility” | 3 |
| 5 | Hernandez v. Astrue | green | “consider the exacerbating effects of a claimant's obesity on her underlying conditions (even if the obesity is not itself a severe impairment) when arriving at a claimant's rfc.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.