2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 36 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from McKinney v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | McKinney v. Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc. Anchor | green | “the panel has discretion to remand, for example, when everything that remains to be done is case-specific.” | 18 |
| 2 | Pickering v. A.L.S. Enterprises, Inc. | green | “the fact that the plaintiffs' claims have some degree of commonality is not a sufficient reason to keep the related actions here.” | 18 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.