4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 46 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from PHC-Minden, L.P. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp..
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | PHC-Minden, L.P. v. Kimberly-Clark Corp. Anchor | green | “as far as the federal constitutional requirements of due process will permit.” | 25 |
| 2 | Ennis v. Loiseau | green | “disturb a trial court's resolution of conflicting evidence that turns on the credibility or weight of the evidence.” | 10 |
| 3 | Ennis v. Loiseau | green | “will not disturb a trial court's resolution of conflicting evidence that turns on the credibility or weight of the evidence.” | 7 |
| 4 | Washington DC Party Shuttle, LLC, Party Shuttle Tours, LLC and Creativerse Internet Systems, LLC v. Iguide Tours, LLC, Tyree Cook, and Abise Eshetu | green | “traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice are offended by the exercise of jurisdiction.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.