Topic: in accordance with its plain meaning. · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #7879

8 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 46 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Armendariz.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 State v. Armendariz Anchor
wash · 2007
green “in accordance with its plain meaning.” 15
2 State v. Ramos
washctapp · 2009
green “authority to define crimes and set punishments rests firmly with the legislature.” 7
3 State v. Ramos
washctapp · 2009
green “authority to define crimes and set punishments rests firmly with the legislature.” 7
4 Snohomish County v. Anderson
wash · 1994
green “a challenge to the constitutionality of a statute by means of a declaratory judgment must be justiciable before it will be considered.” 4
5 State v. Ramos
washctapp · 2009
green “rests firmly with the legislature.” 4
6 State v. Ramos
washctapp · 2009
green “rests firmly with the legislature.” 4
7 State v. Ermert
wash · 1980
green “the determination of crimes and punishment is a legislative function subject to only limited review in the courts.” 3
8 In Re Chi-Dooh Li
wash · 1971
green “article 2, section 1, of the washington state constitution vests all legislative authority in the legislature and in the people,” 2

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check