4 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Jose Guerra v. William Barr.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Jose Guerra v. William Barr Anchor | green | “we review factual findings for substantial evidence and legal questions de novo.” | 24 |
| 2 | Cole v. Holder | green | “highly probative or potentially dispositive evidence” | 9 |
| 3 | Cole v. Holder | green | “discuss each piece of evidence submitted” | 8 |
| 4 | Emilia Velasquez-Gaspar v. William Barr | green | “we review the agency's factual findings under the 'extremely deferential' substantial-evidence standard, under which we treat such findings as 'conclusive unless any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.