2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Schwarzenegger v. Martin Motor Company.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Schwarzenegger v. Martin Motor Company Anchor | green | “where a defendant moves to dismiss a complaint for lack of personal jurisdiction, the plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating that jurisdiction is appropriate.” | 31 |
| 2 | Bernard Picot v. Dean Weston | green | “federal courts ordinarily follow state law in determining the bounds of their jurisdiction over persons.” | 14 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.