6 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr Anchor | green | “the application of a legal standard to undisputed or established facts.” | 14 |
| 2 | Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr | green | “application of a legal standard to undisputed or established facts.” | 10 |
| 3 | Guerrero-Lasprilla v. Barr | green | “the application of a legal standard to undisputed or established facts” | 9 |
| 4 | Krishnapillai v. Holder | green | “a systematic, pervasive, or organized effort” | 4 |
| 5 | Jesus Arreola-Ochoa v. Merrick B. Garland | green | “we must defer to the board's handling of this type of mixed question of law and fact” | 4 |
| 6 | United States v. Benny Butler | green | “only generally argued that the board erred and did not cite specific evidence or arguments in support of his claim that he would be subject to torture” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.