Topic: a district court errs in failing to consider a pro se litig… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #810

3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 35 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Randy Brown v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Randy Brown v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc Anchor
cadc · 2015
green “a district court errs in failing to consider a pro se litigant's complaint 'in light of' all filings, including filings responsive to a motion to dismiss” 14
2 Fillmore v. AT & T Mobility Services LLC
dcd · 2015
green “the court, as it must in a case brought by a pro se plaintiff, considers the facts as alleged in both the complaint and plaintiff's opposition to defendant's motion to dismiss.” 12
3 Randy Brown v. Whole Foods Market Group, Inc
cadc · 2015
green “district court errs in failing to consider a pro se litigant's complaint 'in light of' all filings, including filings responsive to a motion to dismiss.” 9

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check