Topic: where knowledge and ability to exert control over contraban… · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #8117

7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Moore v. United States.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Moore v. United States Anchor
dc · 2007
green “where knowledge and ability to exert control over contraband are shown, the additional evidence necessary to prove constructive possession is comparatively minimal.” 8
2 James M. Schools v. United States
dc · 2013
green “there was no evidence that any mail or papers, photographs, wallet, identification cards, or any other personal effects linked to appellant were found in the back bedroom where the gun and ammunition were found.” 7
3 James M. Schools v. United States
dc · 2013
green “we have often found that evidence was sufficient to establish a defendant's constructive possession of contraband where the contraband was recovered in proximity to the defendant's personal items such as mail or personal papers, photographs, and identification cards.” 6
4 Jamel Evans v. United States
dc · 2015
green “there can be an important distinction between concluding that given evidence would reasonably permit a jury to infer constructive possession and concluding that the same evidence is by itself sufficient to establish constructive possession beyond a reasonable doubt.” 6
5 Jamel Evans v. United States
dc · 2015
green “broad language 'must be understood in context” 6
6 Medina v. United States
dc · 2013
green “must consider all of the evidence including that favorable to the defendant.” 6
7 Bynum v. United States
dc · 2016
green “although each fact viewed individually may not point unerringly to the appellant as possessing the requisite guilty knowledge, when taken as a whole, together with their legitimate inferences, they permit a finding of such guilty knowledge beyond a reasonable doubt.” 6

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check