4 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 45 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. O'Neal.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. O'Neal Anchor | green | “a sufficiency challenge admits the truth of the state's evidence and accepts the reasonable inferences to be made from it.” | 24 |
| 2 | State v. O'Neal | green | “direct evidence is not required to uphold a jury's verdict; circumstantial evidence can be sufficient.” | 11 |
| 3 | State v. Smith | green | “only where no rational trier of fact could find that all elements of the crime were proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 7 |
| 4 | State v. Smith | green | “where no rational trier of fact could find that all elements of the crime were proved beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.