8 canonical passages across 8 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Owen v. Owen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Owen v. Owen Anchor | green | “an estate in bankruptcy consists of all the interests in property, legal and equitable, possessed by the debtor at the time of filing, as well as those interests recovered or recoverable through transfer and lien avoidance provisions.” | 13 |
| 2 | Rousey v. Jacoway | green | “to help the debtor obtain a fresh start, the bankruptcy code permits him to withdraw from the estate certain interests in property, such as his car or home, up to certain values.” | 7 |
| 3 | In Re Storer | green | “ohio has replaced the federal exemptions with its own state exemptions, which are those generally available to debtors under ohio's general debtor-creditor law.” | 5 |
| 4 | In Re Rhinebolt | green | “upon the introduction of sufficient evidence to rebut the prima facie validity of the exemption, the burden shifts to the debtors to demonstrate that the exemption is proper.” | 5 |
| 5 | Hamo v. Wilson (In Re Hamo) | green | “the burden is on the trustee to establish, by a preponderance of the evidence, that the exemption should be disallowed.” | 5 |
| 6 | In Re Elizabeth Hayes Lucas, Debtor. Jane B. Forbes, Trustee v. Elizabeth Hayes Lucas, Holiday Corporation Savings and Retirement Plan | green | “an estate in bankruptcy consists of all the interests in property, legal and equitable, possessed by the debtor at the time of filing, as well as those interests recovered or recoverable through transfer and lien avoidance provisions.” | 3 |
| 7 | In Re Mann | green | “the trustee fails to carry the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the exemption should be disallowed, the exemption will stand.” | 3 |
| 8 | In Re Roselle | green | “a party objecting to claimed exemptions must prove that the exemption is not properly claimed by a preponderance of the evidence.” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.