3 canonical passages across 3 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from United States v. Bains.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | United States v. Bains Anchor | green | “when . . . additional evidence would be truly unnecessary to a fully informed determination of damages.” | 16 |
| 2 | Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc. | green | “(1) that it had prior rights to the mark at issue and (2) that the defendant had adopted a mark or name that was the same, or confusingly similar to its mark, such that consumers were likely to confuse the two.” | 15 |
| 3 | E. Remy Martin & Co., S.A. v. Shaw-Ross International Imports, Inc., and Roger Myers D/B/A F. Remy & Cie | green | “a sufficiently strong showing of likelihood of confusion caused by trademark infringement may by itself constitute a showing of . . . a substantial threat of irreparable harm.” | 13 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.