6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 34 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Zuber v. Allen.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Zuber v. Allen Anchor | green | “legislative silence is a poor beacon to follow in discerning the proper statutory route.” | 9 |
| 2 | Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc. | green | “when congress amends one statutory provision but not another, it is presumed to have acted intentionally.” | 7 |
| 3 | National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. National Assn. of Railroad Passengers | green | “since we hold that no right of action exists, questions of standing and jurisdiction became immaterial.” | 5 |
| 4 | Aliotta v. Bair | green | “under either a disparate treatment or disparate impact theory of discrimination, plaintiffs must show they suffered an adverse employment action.” | 5 |
| 5 | Young v. United Parcel Service, Inc. | green | “we note that employment discrimination law also creates with is called a 'disparate-impact' claim.” | 4 |
| 6 | Anas Elhady v. Charles Kable, IV | green | “we find these decisions persuasive and decline the invitation to create a circuit split.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.