5 canonical passages across 4 cases, quoted by 286 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. Richardson (Slip Opinion).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. Richardson (Slip Opinion) Anchor | green | “this naturally entails a review of the elements of the charged offense and a review of the state's evidence.” | 74 |
| 2 | State v. Murphy | green | “on review for evidentiary sufficiency we do not second-guess the jury's credibility determinations; rather, we ask whether, 'if believed, the evidence would convince the average mind of the defendant's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 72 |
| 3 | State v. Ketterer | green | “disturb a verdict on appeal on sufficiency grounds unless 'reasonable minds could not reach the conclusion reached by the trier-of-fact.” | 72 |
| 4 | State v. Pountney (Slip Opinion) | green | “the relevant inquiry is whether, after viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution, any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime proven beyond a reasonable doubt.” | 62 |
| 5 | State v. Ketterer | green | “will not disturb a verdict on appeal on sufficiency grounds unless 'reasonable minds could not reach the conclusion reached by the trier-of-fact.” | 6 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.