2 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rodriguez v. Hahn.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rodriguez v. Hahn Anchor | green | “proceeding pro se does not otherwise relieve a litigant of the usual requirements of summary judgment, and a pro se party's bald assertions unsupported by evidence, are insufficient to overcome a motion for summary judgment.” | 26 |
| 2 | Ibinga Bertin v. United States of America, Docket No. 05-4503-Cv | green | “liberally construes pleadings and briefs submitted by pro se litigants, reading such submissions to raise the strongest arguments they suggest.” | 18 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.