6 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 44 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from State v. William Roseman and Lori Lewin (073674).
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | State v. William Roseman and Lori Lewin (073674) Anchor | green | “pti is a 'diversionary program through which certain offenders are able to avoid criminal prosecution by receiving early rehabilitative services expected to deter future criminal behavior.” | 22 |
| 2 | State v. K.S. | green | “broad discretion to determine if a defendant should be diverted.” | 7 |
| 3 | State v. Randall | green | “it is designed 'to assist in the rehabilitation of worthy defendants, and, in the process, to spare them the rigors of the criminal justice system.” | 5 |
| 4 | State v. Sean Bell (070736) | green | “rehabilitation of a person accused of a criminal offense.” | 4 |
| 5 | STATE OF NEW JERSEY VS. JOSHUA NICHOLSON (13-12-0773, SOMERSET COUNTY AND STATEWIDE) | green | “clearly and convincingly establishes that the prosecutor's decision constitutes a patent and gross abuse of discretion.” | 3 |
| 6 | State v. K.S. | green | “broad discretion to determine if a defendant should be diverted” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.