5 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Maria Doe v. New York City Department Of Social Services.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Maria Doe v. New York City Department Of Social Services Anchor | green | “an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” | 20 |
| 2 | Morales v. Quintiles Transnational Corp. | green | “is narrow and applies only to already-considered issues; new arguments and issues are not to be considered.” | 8 |
| 3 | Morales v. Quintiles Transnational Corp. | green | “is not a substitute for appeal and 'may be granted only where the court has overlooked matters or controlling decisions which might have materially influenced the earlier decision.” | 6 |
| 4 | Maria Doe v. New York City Department Of Social Services | green | “correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” | 5 |
| 5 | Maria Doe v. New York City Department Of Social Services | green | “the major grounds justifying reconsideration are an intervening change of controlling law, the availability of new evidence, or the need to correct a clear error or prevent manifest injustice.” | 4 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.