Topic: on appeal from the grant of a motion for summary judgment, … · Go Syfert
← All topics

Topic #8451

7 canonical passages across 5 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Martha A. Arregui v. Rosalinda Gallegos-Main.

#Case FlagCanonical passage Citers
1 Martha A. Arregui v. Rosalinda Gallegos-Main Anchor
idaho · 2012
green “on appeal from the grant of a motion for summary judgment, this court utilizes the same standard of review used by the district court originally ruling on the motion.” 16
2 Lapham v. Stewart
idaho · 2002
green “if the evidence reveals no disputed issues of material fact, then only a question of law remains, over which this court exercises free review.” 7
3 Mattox v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.
idaho · 2014
green “the trial court must look at the witness' affidavit or deposition testimony and determine whether it alleges facts which, if taken as true, would render the testimony of that witness admissible.” 5
4 Martha A. Arregui v. Rosalinda Gallegos-Main
idaho · 2012
green “is a threshold matter that is distinct from whether the testimony raises genuine issues of material fact sufficient to preclude summary judgment.” 4
5 Martha A. Arregui v. Rosalinda Gallegos-Main
idaho · 2012
green “the admissibility of expert testimony, however, is a threshold matter that is distinct from whether the testimony raises genuine issues of material fact sufficient to preclude summary judgment.” 4
6 Hall v. Rocky Mtn Emergency Physicians
idaho · 2013
green “the liberal construction and reasonable inferences standard does not apply.” 4
7 Bybee v. Gorman
idaho · 2014
green “the admissibility of expert testimony offered in connection with a motion for summary judgment 'is a threshold matter that is distinct from whether the testimony raises genuine issues of material fact sufficient to preclude summary judgment.” 3

A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.

← Caselaw search · Hot / Trending / Newly red · Brief Check