6 canonical passages across 6 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Apolinar v. State.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Apolinar v. State Anchor | green | “outside the zone of reasonable disagreement.” | 21 |
| 2 | Margraves v. State | green | “required to meet the same rigorous criteria for sufficiency as circumstantial proof of other offensive elements.” | 8 |
| 3 | Reado v. State | green | “to adopt appellant's position would mean that all self-serving statements by an accused would be admissible.” | 4 |
| 4 | Taylor v. State | green | “distinctly set forth the law applicable to the case” | 4 |
| 5 | Hollen v. State | green | “the evidentiary requirements regarding stipulations while avoiding the unfair prejudice that would accompany further mention of the convictions.” | 3 |
| 6 | Castaneda v. State | green | “right to arm and seek an explanation,” | 3 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.