3 canonical passages across 2 cases, quoted by 43 opinions in total. These passages cluster together because the same opinions keep quoting them side by side — they state parts of one doctrine. The anchor passage is from Rodriguez-Reyes v. Molina-Rodriguez.
| # | Case | Flag | Canonical passage | Citers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rodriguez-Reyes v. Molina-Rodriguez Anchor | green | “the elements of a prima facie case may be used as a prism to shed light upon the plausibility of the claim.” | 27 |
| 2 | Carrero-Ojeda v. Autoridad de Energia Electrica | green | “drawing all reasonable inferences in plaintiff's favor,” | 8 |
| 3 | Carrero-Ojeda v. Autoridad de Energia Electrica | green | “isolate and ignore statements in the complaint that simply offer legal labels and conclusions or merely rehash cause-of- action elements.” | 8 |
A red or yellow flag on a member means the underlying case has negative treatment — for those, check the case page before relying on the passage.